PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIMMX vs. SYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIMMX vs. SYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and AlphaCentric Symmetry Strategy Fund Class I (SYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIMMX achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than SYMIX's 10.56% return.


GIMMX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.57%
YTD
7.57%
6M
7.95%
1Y
17.05%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
3.39%

SYMIX

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.13%
YTD
10.56%
6M
12.68%
1Y
25.04%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIMMX vs. SYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GIMMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund
7.57%15.44%-4.85%2.78%-4.72%6.14%6.45%0.49%
SYMIX
AlphaCentric Symmetry Strategy Fund Class I
10.56%12.36%7.61%0.93%6.09%14.07%-2.60%0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GIMMX and SYMIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2019

0.33

Over the past year, GIMMX and SYMIX have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIMMX vs. SYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIMMX
GIMMX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GIMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GIMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SYMIX
SYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIMMX vs. SYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and AlphaCentric Symmetry Strategy Fund Class I (SYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIMMXSYMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

4.15

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

14.78

-2.01

GIMMX vs. SYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIMMX and SYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIMMXSYMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.18

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.65

-0.15

Drawdowns

GIMMX vs. SYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIMMX drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, smaller than the maximum SYMIX drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMMX and SYMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIMMXSYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.67%

-17.44%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-6.07%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.74%

-12.03%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.67%

-12.20%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-1.67%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-4.19%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.70%

-0.39%

Volatility

GIMMX vs. SYMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) is 1.44%, while AlphaCentric Symmetry Strategy Fund Class I (SYMIX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that GIMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIMMXSYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

2.87%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.75%

9.20%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.37%

11.54%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

10.88%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

11.01%

-5.55%

GIMMX vs. SYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIMMX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than SYMIX's 1.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIMMX vs. SYMIX - Dividend Comparison

GIMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, while SYMIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIMMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund
7.79%8.38%5.08%3.43%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.97%0.00%0.00%1.83%0.72%
SYMIX
AlphaCentric Symmetry Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.06%9.82%0.25%1.71%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIMMX and SYMIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SYMIX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to GIMMX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIMMX dropped -12.67% vs SYMIX's -17.44%.

SYMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIMMX and SYMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer