GIMMX vs. SVPFX
GIMMX (Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund) and SVPFX (Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund) are both mutual funds - GIMMX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while SVPFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, GIMMX returned 3.15%/yr vs 2.15%/yr for SVPFX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIMMX charges 1.93%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for SVPFX.
Performance
GIMMX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIMMX achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 2.00% return.
GIMMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- 3.16%
SVPFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.15%
- 10Y*
- —
GIMMX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund | 6.19% | 15.44% | -4.85% | 2.78% | -4.72% | 5.39% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 2.00% | 4.19% | 3.82% | 5.30% | -4.37% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIMMX and SVPFX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.08 |
The correlation between GIMMX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (5 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIMMX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank
GIMMX
SVPFX
GIMMX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIMMX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.60 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 6.48 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 23.92 | -13.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIMMX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIMMX drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMMX and SVPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIMMX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -6.37% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -0.91% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.74% | -5.32% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.67% | -6.37% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -0.20% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -1.90% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 0.39% | +1.00% |
Volatility
GIMMX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.78%. This indicates that GIMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIMMX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 0.78% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.70% | 1.75% | +3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.50% | 2.22% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 5.62% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 5.48% | 0.00% |
GIMMX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIMMX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIMMX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison
GIMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than SVPFX's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund | 7.89% | 8.38% | 5.08% | 3.43% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% | 0.72% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 3.19% | 1.83% | 4.37% | 4.29% | 0.76% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIMMX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIMMX has higher volatility (1.76%) compared to SVPFX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIMMX dropped -12.67% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.
SVPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIMMX and SVPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer