GIMMX vs. MAFIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GIMMX (Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund) and MAFIX (Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, GIMMX returned 3.11%/yr vs 7.49%/yr for MAFIX. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GIMMX charges 1.93%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for MAFIX.

Performance

GIMMX vs. MAFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIMMX achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than MAFIX's 8.66% return.

GIMMX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 3.96%
• YTD: 6.74%
• 1Y: 15.61%
• 3Y*: 6.92%
• 5Y*: 3.11%
• 10Y*: 3.23%
• ALL TIME*: 2.60%

MAFIX

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -0.65%
• 6M: 4.42%
• YTD: 8.66%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 8.03%
• 5Y*: 7.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MAFIX Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GIMMX vs. MAFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund	6.74%	15.44%	-4.85%	2.78%	-4.72%	6.14%	6.45%	7.60%	-0.40%
MAFIX Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I	8.66%	8.41%	8.99%	5.02%	4.08%	14.79%	24.89%	21.63%	-1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GIMMX and MAFIX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018	0.43

Over the past year, GIMMX and MAFIX have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

GIMMX vs. MAFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GIMMX

GIMMX Risk / Return Rank: 74
GIMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GIMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GIMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
GIMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GIMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MAFIX

MAFIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
MAFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MAFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MAFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MAFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MAFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GIMMX vs. MAFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIMMX	MAFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.85	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.51	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	3.30	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.06	9.93	+0.13

GIMMX vs. MAFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the MAFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIMMX and MAFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIMMX vs. MAFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIMMX drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, smaller than the maximum MAFIX drawdown of -19.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMMX and MAFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIMMX	MAFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.67%	-19.21%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.18%	-7.26%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.74%	-19.21%	+8.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.67%	-19.21%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-4.28%	+3.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-3.41%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.43%	2.41%	-0.98%

Volatility

GIMMX vs. MAFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) is 1.58%, while Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that GIMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIMMX	MAFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	2.94%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.29%	9.07%	-3.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.57%	13.05%	-4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.89%	12.31%	-6.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.49%	12.84%	-7.35%

GIMMX vs. MAFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIMMX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than MAFIX's 1.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIMMX vs. MAFIX - Dividend Comparison

GIMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, less than MAFIX's 10.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund	7.85%	8.38%	5.08%	3.43%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%	1.83%	0.72%
MAFIX Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I	10.84%	11.78%	4.57%	3.80%	4.12%	10.65%	10.29%	12.30%	9.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIMMX and MAFIX in my portfolio?

GIMMX and MAFIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIMMX or MAFIX?

MAFIX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to GIMMX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIMMX dropped -12.67% vs MAFIX's -19.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.