PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIMMX vs. ADAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIMMX vs. ADAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I (ADAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIMMX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than ADAIX's 2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GIMMX has underperformed ADAIX with an annualized return of 3.41%, while ADAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.85% annualized return.


GIMMX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.37%
YTD
7.76%
6M
8.32%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
3.41%

ADAIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.69%
YTD
2.96%
6M
3.46%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
6.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIMMX vs. ADAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIMMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund
7.76%15.44%-4.85%2.78%-4.72%6.14%6.45%7.60%-3.51%-0.19%
ADAIX
AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I
2.96%8.03%3.19%4.51%-3.30%6.27%25.24%8.53%2.19%5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GIMMX and ADAIX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.15

The correlation between GIMMX and ADAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIMMX vs. ADAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIMMX
GIMMX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GIMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GIMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ADAIX
ADAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ADAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ADAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIMMX vs. ADAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I (ADAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIMMXADAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

2.26

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

14.61

-10.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

44.38

-31.70

GIMMX vs. ADAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the ADAIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIMMX and ADAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIMMXADAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

4.84

-2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.15

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

1.59

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.21

-0.71

Drawdowns

GIMMX vs. ADAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIMMX drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, smaller than the maximum ADAIX drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMMX and ADAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIMMXADAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.67%

-14.75%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-0.46%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.74%

-1.78%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.67%

-7.40%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.67%

-14.75%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.15%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-2.82%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

0.15%

+1.16%

Volatility

GIMMX vs. ADAIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I (ADAIX) at 0.37%. This indicates that GIMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIMMXADAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

0.37%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.75%

1.06%

+4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.37%

1.40%

+6.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

2.62%

+3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

4.32%

+1.14%

GIMMX vs. ADAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIMMX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than ADAIX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIMMX vs. ADAIX - Dividend Comparison

GIMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.77%, more than ADAIX's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADAIX
AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class I
2.06%2.12%1.23%2.74%0.10%0.65%1.60%2.11%6.53%7.17%7.18%4.93%
GIMMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund
7.77%8.38%5.08%3.43%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.97%0.00%0.00%1.83%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIMMX and ADAIX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIMMX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to ADAIX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIMMX dropped -12.67% vs ADAIX's -14.75%.

ADAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.84 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIMMX and ADAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer