GILT vs. AQST
GILT (Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd) and AQST (Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.) are both stocks. GILT operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while AQST operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, GILT returned 6.65%/yr vs -0.29%/yr for AQST. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GILT vs. AQST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILT achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than AQST's -35.45% return.
GILT
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- 1Y
- 138.10%
- 3Y*
- 37.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
AQST
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- -35.45%
- 6M
- -32.85%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.29%
- 10Y*
- —
GILT vs. AQST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 15.92% | 110.41% | 0.65% | 5.34% | -17.96% | 18.14% | -12.01% | -9.43% | 7.64% |
AQST Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. | -35.45% | 81.46% | 76.24% | 123.92% | -76.81% | -27.29% | -8.08% | -7.62% | -58.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILT and AQST is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
GILT:
$1.16B
AQST:
$511.28M
GILT:
$0.49
AQST:
-$0.61
GILT:
2.09
AQST:
9.42
GILT:
$470.09M
AQST:
$50.27M
GILT:
$142.60M
AQST:
$20.92M
GILT:
$56.44M
AQST:
-$53.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILT vs. AQST — Risk / Return Rank
GILT
AQST
GILT vs. AQST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. (AQST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GILT | AQST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.16 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 0.43 | +3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 0.81 | +9.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GILT vs. AQST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum AQST drawdown of -96.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILT and AQST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILT | AQST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -96.68% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.96% | -60.61% | +25.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.94% | -63.55% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.20% | -90.11% | +26.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.47% | -78.01% | -21.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.78% | -76.92% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.93% | 32.01% | -18.08% |
Volatility
GILT vs. AQST - Volatility Comparison
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a higher volatility of 25.22% compared to Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. (AQST) at 21.51%. This indicates that GILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILT | AQST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.22% | 21.51% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.23% | 68.41% | -8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.60% | 85.07% | -13.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 82.62% | -33.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.79% | 87.69% | -39.90% |
Dividends
GILT vs. AQST - Dividend Comparison
Neither GILT nor AQST has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQST Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.91% | 5.52% | 5.71% |
Financials
GILT vs. AQST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GILT vs. AQST - Profitability Comparison
GILT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.65M and revenue of 110.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.
AQST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 14.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GILT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported an operating income of 5.43M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
AQST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.20M and revenue of 14.45M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.1%.
GILT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a net income of 5.23M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
AQST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. reported a net income of -8.06M and revenue of 14.45M, resulting in a net margin of -55.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GILT and AQST have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GILT has higher volatility (25.22%) compared to AQST (21.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILT dropped -99.94% vs AQST's -96.68%.
GILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GILT and AQST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer