GILD vs. MRSH
GILD (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) and MRSH (Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc) are both stocks. GILD operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while MRSH operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GILD returned 7.84%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for MRSH. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GILD vs. MRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILD achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than MRSH's -8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GILD has underperformed MRSH with an annualized return of 7.84%, while MRSH has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.
GILD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 16.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.02%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
MRSH
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- -8.15%
- 6M
- -8.49%
- 1Y
- -20.92%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
GILD vs. MRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2.90% | 36.59% | 18.68% | -1.99% | 23.63% | 29.95% | -6.70% | 7.88% | -9.92% | 2.96% |
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | -8.15% | -11.26% | 13.75% | 16.15% | -3.45% | 50.83% | 6.86% | 42.33% | -0.14% | 22.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILD and MRSH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1992 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GILD and MRSH has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GILD:
$157.49B
MRSH:
$81.98B
GILD:
$7.35
MRSH:
$7.99
GILD:
17.09
MRSH:
21.11
GILD:
0.04
MRSH:
2.46
GILD:
5.30
MRSH:
3.01
GILD:
6.70
MRSH:
5.54
GILD:
$29.74B
MRSH:
$27.52B
GILD:
$18.74B
MRSH:
$11.66B
GILD:
$12.88B
MRSH:
$6.68B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILD vs. MRSH — Risk / Return Rank
GILD
MRSH
GILD vs. MRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GILD | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.85 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | -0.80 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | -1.40 | +3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GILD vs. MRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILD drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, roughly equal to the maximum MRSH drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILD and MRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILD | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.83% | -67.46% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.59% | -27.01% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.59% | -34.36% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.59% | -34.36% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.47% | -35.80% | +5.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.93% | -29.62% | +10.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -17.41% | -4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 15.50% | -7.89% |
Volatility
GILD vs. MRSH - Volatility Comparison
Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) at 6.91%. This indicates that GILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILD | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 6.91% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.02% | 19.10% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.62% | 23.47% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 20.20% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 20.94% | +4.58% |
Dividends
GILD vs. MRSH - Dividend Comparison
GILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than MRSH's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 1.91% | 2.57% | 3.33% | 3.70% | 3.40% | 3.91% | 4.67% | 3.88% | 3.65% | 2.90% | 2.57% | 1.27% |
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | 2.13% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% |
Financials
GILD vs. MRSH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GILD vs. MRSH - Profitability Comparison
GILD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.
MRSH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 7.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
GILD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
MRSH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
GILD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.
MRSH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GILD and MRSH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GILD has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to MRSH (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILD dropped -70.83% vs MRSH's -67.46%.
GILD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GILD and MRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer