GILAX vs. LUBYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GILAX (Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund) and LUBYX (Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - GILAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LUBYX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 5 years, GILAX returned 9.65%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for LUBYX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GILAX charges 1.71%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for LUBYX.

Performance

GILAX vs. LUBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) and Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILAX achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than LUBYX's 1.44% return.

GILAX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 3.77%
• 1Y: 18.20%
• 3Y*: 17.04%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: 9.89%

LUBYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: 5.15%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILAX vs. LUBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GILAX Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund	3.39%	16.30%	19.60%	12.26%	-10.02%	28.08%	2.02%	21.75%	-9.73%	11.44%
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund	1.44%	4.99%	5.70%	5.16%	-0.38%	0.07%	1.27%	3.00%	2.09%	0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GILAX and LUBYX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2016	0.03

Return for Risk

GILAX vs. LUBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILAX

GILAX Risk / Return Rank: 40
GILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
GILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
GILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

LUBYX

LUBYX Risk / Return Rank: 98
LUBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LUBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LUBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
LUBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LUBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILAX vs. LUBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) and Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GILAX	LUBYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	3.20	-1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	10.24	-7.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	3.41	-2.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	11.11	-8.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.60	52.32	-42.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GILAX vs. LUBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the LUBYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILAX and LUBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GILAX	LUBYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	3.20	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	2.46	-1.83
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	2.22	-1.69

Drawdowns

GILAX vs. LUBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILAX drawdown since its inception was -47.62%, which is greater than LUBYX's maximum drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILAX and LUBYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GILAX	LUBYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.62%	-2.59%	-45.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	-0.40%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.32%	-0.50%	-15.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.46%	-1.86%	-18.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	0.00%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-0.17%	-5.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	0.08%	+1.88%

Volatility

GILAX vs. LUBYX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) at 0.40%. This indicates that GILAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GILAX	LUBYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	0.40%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.09%	0.95%	+7.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.55%	1.38%	+9.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	1.37%	+14.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	1.12%	+16.84%

GILAX vs. LUBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILAX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LUBYX's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

GILAX vs. LUBYX - Dividend Comparison

GILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than LUBYX's 4.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GILAX Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund	8.60%	8.89%	7.47%	0.14%	5.58%	13.50%	0.84%	11.27%	9.48%	12.37%	4.89%	10.61%
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund	4.41%	4.66%	4.72%	3.69%	1.33%	0.57%	1.16%	2.55%	2.27%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GILAX and LUBYX in my portfolio?

GILAX and LUBYX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GILAX or LUBYX?

GILAX has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to LUBYX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILAX dropped -47.62% vs LUBYX's -2.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LUBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.