GILAX vs. FLCOX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GILAX (Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund) and FLCOX (Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GILAX returned 9.63%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for FLCOX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GILAX charges 1.71%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FLCOX.

Performance

GILAX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILAX achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 14.25% return.

GILAX

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 3.09%
• 6M: 4.56%
• 1Y: 18.41%
• 3Y*: 16.93%
• 5Y*: 9.63%
• 10Y*: 9.86%

FLCOX

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 14.25%
• 6M: 14.85%
• 1Y: 28.31%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILAX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GILAX Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund	3.09%	16.30%	19.60%	12.26%	-10.02%	28.08%	2.02%	21.75%	-9.73%	10.41%
FLCOX Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund	14.25%	15.90%	14.38%	11.48%	-7.57%	25.09%	2.87%	26.54%	-8.38%	10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GILAX and FLCOX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.96

The correlation between GILAX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GILAX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILAX

GILAX Risk / Return Rank: 41
GILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
GILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FLCOX

FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILAX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GILAX	FLCOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.70	-0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	3.82	-1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.49	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	4.29	-1.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.71	18.04	-8.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GILAX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILAX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GILAX	FLCOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.70	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.71	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.60	-0.07

Drawdowns

GILAX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILAX drawdown since its inception was -47.62%, which is greater than FLCOX's maximum drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILAX and FLCOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GILAX	FLCOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.62%	-38.28%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	-6.80%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.32%	-15.60%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.46%	-19.00%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	0.00%	-2.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-4.45%	-1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.62%	+0.33%

Volatility

GILAX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) is 2.66%, while Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that GILAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GILAX	FLCOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	3.06%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.09%	8.14%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.56%	10.80%	-0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	14.83%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	17.64%	+0.32%

GILAX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILAX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

GILAX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

GILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than FLCOX's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCOX Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund	1.32%	1.51%	1.92%	1.99%	2.01%	1.55%	2.28%	3.82%	2.79%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%
GILAX Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund	8.62%	8.89%	7.47%	0.14%	5.58%	13.50%	0.84%	11.27%	9.48%	12.37%	4.89%	10.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GILAX and FLCOX in my portfolio?

GILAX and FLCOX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GILAX or FLCOX?

FLCOX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to GILAX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILAX dropped -47.62% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.