GILAX vs. LBNDX
GILAX (Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund) and LBNDX (Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund) are both mutual funds - GILAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LBNDX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, GILAX returned 10.42%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for LBNDX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GILAX charges 1.71%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for LBNDX.
Performance
GILAX vs. LBNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILAX achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly higher than LBNDX's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GILAX has outperformed LBNDX with an annualized return of 10.42%, while LBNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
GILAX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
LBNDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 1.56%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
GILAX vs. LBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILAX Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund | 5.23% | 16.30% | 19.60% | 12.26% | -10.02% | 28.08% | 2.02% | 21.75% | -9.73% | 11.44% |
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund | 1.21% | 8.42% | 6.29% | 6.38% | -13.67% | 3.25% | 7.65% | 13.40% | -3.76% | 9.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILAX and LBNDX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994 | 0.53 |
The correlation between GILAX and LBNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILAX vs. LBNDX — Risk / Return Rank
GILAX
LBNDX
GILAX vs. LBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GILAX | LBNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 1.86 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | 7.50 | +2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GILAX vs. LBNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILAX drawdown since its inception was -47.62%, which is greater than LBNDX's maximum drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILAX and LBNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILAX | LBNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.62% | -26.67% | -20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -4.08% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.32% | -4.51% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.46% | -17.33% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.77% | -19.77% | -19.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.77% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -3.52% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.01% | +0.97% |
Volatility
GILAX vs. LBNDX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund (GILAX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) at 1.12%. This indicates that GILAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILAX | LBNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 1.12% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 3.21% | +5.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 4.11% | +6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 4.70% | +10.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 5.04% | +12.93% |
GILAX vs. LBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILAX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LBNDX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
GILAX vs. LBNDX - Dividend Comparison
GILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, more than LBNDX's 6.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILAX Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund | 8.45% | 8.89% | 7.47% | 0.14% | 5.58% | 13.50% | 0.84% | 11.27% | 9.48% | 12.37% | 4.89% | 10.61% |
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund | 6.06% | 5.92% | 5.38% | 4.66% | 3.67% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 4.02% | 6.43% | 4.82% | 4.58% | 5.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GILAX and LBNDX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GILAX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to LBNDX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILAX dropped -47.62% vs LBNDX's -26.67%.
GILAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GILAX and LBNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer