GIL vs. VNLA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GIL (Gildan Activewear Inc.) is a stock, while VNLA (Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 5 years, GIL returned 11.96%/yr vs 3.79%/yr for VNLA. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GIL vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than VNLA's 1.43% return.

GIL

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: -6.03%
• 6M: 2.26%
• 1Y: 27.04%
• 3Y*: 28.43%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: 8.61%

VNLA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.85%
• 1Y: 4.75%
• 3Y*: 5.76%
• 5Y*: 3.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIL vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.	-6.03%	35.08%	45.31%	23.58%	-33.93%	54.00%	-4.46%	-1.17%	-4.58%	29.00%
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF	1.43%	5.45%	6.41%	6.09%	-0.17%	-0.18%	3.01%	4.43%	0.02%	2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GIL and VNLA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2016	0.01

The correlation between GIL and VNLA shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GIL vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIL

GIL Risk / Return Rank: 64
GIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
GIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GIL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
GIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GIL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

VNLA

VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 98
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIL vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIL	VNLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	7.55	-6.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	15.48	-14.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	3.58	-2.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	11.15	-10.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.65	57.27	-54.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIL vs. VNLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the VNLA Sharpe Ratio of 7.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIL and VNLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIL	VNLA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	7.55	-6.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	3.66	-3.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	2.10	-1.57

Drawdowns

GIL vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than VNLA's maximum drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and VNLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIL	VNLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.23%	-4.49%	-82.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.71%	-0.43%	-25.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.28%	-0.49%	-30.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.97%	-1.76%	-36.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.13%	-0.02%	-19.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.13%	-0.23%	-18.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.24%	0.08%	+10.16%

Volatility

GIL vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison

Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) at 0.18%. This indicates that GIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIL	VNLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.88%	0.18%	+9.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.56%	0.46%	+25.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.08%	0.63%	+33.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.00%	1.04%	+30.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.55%	1.42%	+33.13%

Dividends

GIL vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison

GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VNLA's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.	1.63%	1.45%	1.74%	2.25%	2.47%	1.53%	0.55%	1.82%	1.48%	1.16%	1.23%	0.91%
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF	4.78%	4.84%	4.97%	3.95%	4.35%	1.67%	1.21%	3.13%	2.43%	1.79%	0.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIL and VNLA in my portfolio?

GIL and VNLA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIL or VNLA?

GIL has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to VNLA (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIL dropped -87.23% vs VNLA's -4.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.55 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.