GIL vs. INOD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GIL (Gildan Activewear Inc.) and INOD (Innodata Inc.) are both stocks. GIL operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while INOD operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, GIL returned 8.61%/yr vs 46.06%/yr for INOD. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GIL vs. INOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Innodata Inc. (INOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than INOD's 112.50% return. Over the past 10 years, GIL has underperformed INOD with an annualized return of 8.61%, while INOD has yielded a comparatively higher 46.06% annualized return.

GIL

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: -6.03%
• 6M: 2.26%
• 1Y: 27.04%
• 3Y*: 28.43%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: 8.61%

INOD

• 1D: -5.21%
• 1M: 136.81%
• YTD: 112.50%
• 6M: 81.51%
• 1Y: 144.51%
• 3Y*: 111.83%
• 5Y*: 72.06%
• 10Y*: 46.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIL vs. INOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.	-6.03%	35.08%	45.31%	23.58%	-33.93%	54.00%	-4.46%	-1.17%	-4.58%	29.00%
INOD Innodata Inc.	112.50%	28.92%	385.50%	174.54%	-49.92%	11.70%	364.91%	-24.00%	10.29%	-44.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GIL and INOD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 1998	0.15

The correlation between GIL and INOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap GIL : $10.77B INOD : $3.85B
EPS GIL : $1.54 INOD : $1.11
PE Ratio GIL : 37.76 INOD : 97.55
PS Ratio GIL : 2.30 INOD : 13.52
PB Ratio GIL : 3.16 INOD : 30.05
Total Revenue (TTM) GIL : $4.09B INOD : $283.42M
Gross Profit (TTM) GIL : $1.18B INOD : $76.88M
EBITDA (TTM) GIL : $631.40M INOD : $37.35M

Return for Risk

GIL vs. INOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIL

GIL Risk / Return Rank: 64
GIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
GIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GIL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
GIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GIL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

INOD

INOD Risk / Return Rank: 78
INOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
INOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
INOD Omega Ratio Rank: 81
INOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
INOD Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIL vs. INOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Innodata Inc. (INOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIL	INOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	1.20	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.74	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.32	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	2.31	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.65	4.16	-1.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIL vs. INOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the INOD Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIL and INOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIL	INOD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	1.20	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.68	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.52	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.13	+0.40

Drawdowns

GIL vs. INOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, smaller than the maximum INOD drawdown of -95.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and INOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIL	INOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.23%	-95.47%	+8.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.71%	-63.03%	+37.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.28%	-63.03%	+31.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.97%	-74.44%	+36.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.44%	-74.44%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.13%	-6.11%	-13.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.13%	-60.11%	+40.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.24%	34.85%	-24.61%

Volatility

GIL vs. INOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) is 9.88%, while Innodata Inc. (INOD) has a volatility of 69.16%. This indicates that GIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIL	INOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.88%	69.16%	-59.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.56%	86.87%	-61.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.08%	121.37%	-87.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.00%	106.47%	-74.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.55%	89.14%	-54.59%

Dividends

GIL vs. INOD - Dividend Comparison

GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while INOD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.	1.63%	1.45%	1.74%	2.25%	2.47%	1.53%	0.55%	1.82%	1.48%	1.16%	1.23%	0.91%
INOD Innodata Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

GIL vs. INOD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gildan Activewear Inc. and Innodata Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GIL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a gross profit of 278.35M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

INOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GIL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported an operating income of 59.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

INOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GIL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a net income of -65.79M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -5.6%.

INOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a net income of 14.90M and revenue of 90.10M, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIL and INOD in my portfolio?

GIL and INOD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIL or INOD?

INOD has higher volatility (69.16%) compared to GIL (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIL dropped -87.23% vs INOD's -95.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.