PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIIAX vs. FCNSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIIAX vs. FCNSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide International Index Fund (GIIAX) and Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GIIAX having a 9.14% return and FCNSX slightly lower at 8.91%.


GIIAX

1D
0.35%
1M
4.04%
YTD
9.14%
6M
11.61%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
8.72%

FCNSX

1D
0.84%
1M
2.14%
YTD
8.91%
6M
12.70%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIIAX vs. FCNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIIAX
Nationwide International Index Fund
9.14%31.11%3.05%16.88%-14.43%10.67%7.26%21.56%-14.10%6.98%
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
8.91%28.56%9.88%15.95%-6.88%28.62%4.47%27.78%-15.01%10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GIIAX and FCNSX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2017

0.76

The correlation between GIIAX and FCNSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIIAX vs. FCNSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIIAX
GIIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GIIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GIIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNSX
FCNSX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FCNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIIAX vs. FCNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide International Index Fund (GIIAX) and Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIIAXFCNSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.95

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.79

10.42

-3.63

GIIAX vs. FCNSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FCNSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIIAX and FCNSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIIAXFCNSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.75

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.73

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.64

-0.42

Drawdowns

GIIAX vs. FCNSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIIAX drawdown since its inception was -61.28%, which is greater than FCNSX's maximum drawdown of -41.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIIAX and FCNSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIIAXFCNSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.28%

-41.47%

-19.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.21%

-7.48%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-12.13%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.61%

-21.35%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.05%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.06%

-5.17%

-10.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.11%

+0.94%

Volatility

GIIAX vs. FCNSX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide International Index Fund (GIIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) at 2.81%. This indicates that GIIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIIAXFCNSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

2.81%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

9.97%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.59%

12.65%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

16.26%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

18.55%

-2.18%

GIIAX vs. FCNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIIAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIIAX vs. FCNSX - Dividend Comparison

GIIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than FCNSX's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
1.89%2.06%3.05%3.42%3.12%2.20%2.14%2.24%2.51%1.07%0.00%0.00%
GIIAX
Nationwide International Index Fund
6.55%7.14%3.84%2.99%1.90%3.69%1.58%4.20%6.17%6.21%2.87%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIIAX and FCNSX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIIAX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to FCNSX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIIAX dropped -61.28% vs FCNSX's -41.47%.

FCNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIIAX and FCNSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer