GIIAX vs. NADCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide International Index Fund (GIIAX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX).
GIIAX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Dec 29, 1999. NADCX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Mar 29, 2000.
Performance
GIIAX vs. NADCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIIAX vs. NADCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIIAX Nationwide International Index Fund | -2.12% | 31.11% | 3.05% | 16.88% | -14.43% | 10.67% | 7.26% | 21.56% | -14.10% | 24.81% |
NADCX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund | -2.04% | 10.98% | 6.76% | 11.80% | -14.20% | 7.63% | 9.77% | 12.53% | -4.34% | 8.37% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GIIAX having a -2.12% return and NADCX slightly higher at -2.04%. Over the past 10 years, GIIAX has outperformed NADCX with an annualized return of 7.92%, while NADCX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.75% annualized return.
GIIAX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -10.95%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.92%
NADCX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- -2.04%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 7.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIIAX vs. NADCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIIAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than NADCX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GIIAX vs. NADCX — Risk / Return Rank
GIIAX
NADCX
GIIAX vs. NADCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide International Index Fund (GIIAX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIIAX | NADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.63 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.55 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 6.13 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIIAX | NADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.61 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.55 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIIAX and NADCX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GIIAX vs. NADCX - Dividend Comparison
GIIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, more than NADCX's 4.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIIAX Nationwide International Index Fund | 7.30% | 7.14% | 3.84% | 2.99% | 1.90% | 3.69% | 1.58% | 4.20% | 6.17% | 6.21% | 2.87% | 3.36% |
NADCX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund | 4.90% | 4.76% | 9.54% | 4.85% | 2.89% | 3.22% | 4.17% | 3.27% | 8.13% | 4.95% | 4.58% | 4.39% |
Drawdowns
GIIAX vs. NADCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIIAX drawdown since its inception was -61.28%, which is greater than NADCX's maximum drawdown of -24.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIIAX and NADCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIIAX | NADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.28% | -24.64% | -36.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.21% | -5.21% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.61% | -20.23% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.23% | -20.23% | -14.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.95% | -5.11% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.15% | -3.36% | -12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 1.32% | +1.65% |
Volatility
GIIAX vs. NADCX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide International Index Fund (GIIAX) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX) at 2.96%. This indicates that GIIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NADCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIIAX | NADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 2.96% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | 4.55% | +5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.53% | 7.36% | +8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 7.86% | +7.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 7.82% | +8.45% |