GII vs. GLD
GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GII returned 8.29%/yr vs 13.21%/yr for GLD. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
GII vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GII has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 8.29%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.
GII
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 31.19%
- 5Y*
- 18.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
GII vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 8.32% | 21.79% | 14.30% | 5.90% | -0.54% | 11.39% | -6.81% | 26.32% | -10.08% | 19.07% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 3.77% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GII and GLD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.20 |
The correlation between GII and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GII vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GII
GLD
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
GII
GLD
-
Utilities
GII
GLD
-
Energy
GII
GLD
-
Financial Services
GII
GLD
-
Technology
GII
GLD
-
Communication Services
GII
GLD
-
Real Estate
GII
GLD
-
Basic Materials
GII
-
GLD
Consumer Cyclical
GII
-
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
GII
-
GLD
-
Healthcare
GII
-
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GII vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
GII
GLD
GII vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GII | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.69 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 4.15 | +4.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GII | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.22 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.02 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.83 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.60 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
GII vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GII | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -45.56% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | -19.21% | +13.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -19.21% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -21.03% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | -22.00% | -20.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -17.07% | +13.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -16.16% | +4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 7.81% | -5.89% |
Volatility
GII vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is 3.84%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that GII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GII | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 5.50% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 23.16% | -14.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.75% | 26.60% | -15.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 18.00% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 15.95% | +1.19% |
GII vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GII and GLD have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
GII vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.70% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GII and GLD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to GII (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.21% vs 8.29% for GII. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.21% return vs 8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GII and GLD have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while GLD is Gold. GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM.
GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GII and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer