GIGL vs. IGHG
GIGL (Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF) and IGHG (ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past year, GIGL returned 4.94% vs 5.75% for IGHG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIGL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IGHG.
Performance
GIGL vs. IGHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGL achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than IGHG's 1.97% return.
GIGL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGHG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
GIGL vs. IGHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 1.13% | 3.76% |
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 1.97% | 3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGL and IGHG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGL vs. IGHG — Risk / Return Rank
GIGL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGHG
GIGL vs. IGHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIGL | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIGL vs. IGHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGL drawdown since its inception was -3.13%, smaller than the maximum IGHG drawdown of -25.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGL and IGHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGL | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -25.16% | +22.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -1.75% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.36% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.72% | -2.29% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility
GIGL vs. IGHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGL | IGHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 3.41% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 5.02% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 7.45% | -3.28% |
GIGL vs. IGHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IGHG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIGL vs. IGHG - Dividend Comparison
GIGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than IGHG's 5.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 3.75% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 5.12% | 5.14% | 5.06% | 4.99% | 3.55% | 2.50% | 2.79% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIGL and IGHG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IGHG leads with 5.75% vs 4.94% for GIGL. On fees, GIGL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IGHG has performed better with a 5.75% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIGL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.
IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 3.75% for GIGL.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GIGL and 0.30% for IGHG.
Find the right allocation for GIGL and IGHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer