PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIFIX vs. FLOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIFIX vs. FLOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIFIX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than FLOTX's -0.16% return.


GIFIX

1D
0.04%
1M
0.09%
6M
2.06%
YTD
1.90%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
5.97%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
4.25%
ALL TIME*
4.74%

FLOTX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.34%
6M
0.16%
YTD
-0.16%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GIFIX vs. FLOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GIFIX
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund
1.90%4.13%7.22%13.03%-2.05%4.55%1.36%6.69%-0.80%
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
-0.16%2.47%6.76%8.28%-3.59%2.45%3.95%3.51%1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GIFIX and FLOTX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIFIX vs. FLOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GIFIX
GIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOTX
FLOTX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FLOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GIFIX vs. FLOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIFIXFLOTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.28

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

0.93

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

2.32

+6.04

GIFIX vs. FLOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the FLOTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIFIX and FLOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIFIX vs. FLOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIFIX drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, which is greater than FLOTX's maximum drawdown of -4.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIFIX and FLOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIFIXFLOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-4.40%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-2.36%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.49%

-3.34%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.30%

-4.40%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.59%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-1.03%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.95%

-0.48%

Volatility

GIFIX vs. FLOTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund (GIFIX) is 0.29%, while Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX) has a volatility of 0.42%. This indicates that GIFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIFIXFLOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

0.42%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

1.35%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33%

1.69%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.72%

2.69%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.36%

2.44%

+0.92%

GIFIX vs. FLOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIFIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOTX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIFIX vs. FLOTX - Dividend Comparison

GIFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than FLOTX's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
6.69%5.79%7.15%7.16%1.56%2.13%2.42%3.78%3.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GIFIX
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund
6.29%7.40%8.47%8.34%3.64%2.91%3.78%4.38%4.71%3.83%4.10%4.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIFIX and FLOTX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLOTX has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to GIFIX (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIFIX dropped -19.03% vs FLOTX's -4.40%.

GIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIFIX and FLOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer