PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOTX vs. PYFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLOTX vs. PYFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOTX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than PYFRX's 1.52% return.


FLOTX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*

PYFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.01%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOTX vs. PYFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
-0.66%2.47%6.76%8.28%-3.59%2.45%3.95%3.51%1.96%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
1.52%6.61%8.90%12.86%0.27%3.93%1.72%8.49%-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOTX and PYFRX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOTX vs. PYFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOTX
FLOTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FLOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PYFRX
PYFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PYFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PYFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOTX vs. PYFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX) and Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLOTXPYFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.93

-1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

6.69

-5.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

28.09

-24.54

FLOTX vs. PYFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the PYFRX Sharpe Ratio of 5.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOTX and PYFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLOTXPYFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

5.26

-3.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

3.23

-2.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Drawdowns

FLOTX vs. PYFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOTX drawdown since its inception was -4.40%, smaller than the maximum PYFRX drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOTX and PYFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOTXPYFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-20.18%

+15.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.36%

-0.97%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.34%

-2.66%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.40%

-4.80%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

0.00%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.03%

-0.59%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.23%

+0.65%

Volatility

FLOTX vs. PYFRX - Volatility Comparison

Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX) has a higher volatility of 0.45% compared to Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) at 0.32%. This indicates that FLOTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOTXPYFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

0.32%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.34%

1.02%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67%

1.23%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.68%

1.95%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.46%

3.62%

-1.16%

FLOTX vs. PYFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOTX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PYFRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLOTX vs. PYFRX - Dividend Comparison

FLOTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than PYFRX's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
6.81%5.79%7.15%7.16%1.56%2.13%2.42%3.78%3.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
7.04%7.55%8.88%8.35%5.08%2.94%3.19%4.45%4.22%3.30%3.53%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOTX and PYFRX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLOTX has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to PYFRX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOTX dropped -4.40% vs PYFRX's -20.18%.

PYFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.26 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOTX and PYFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer