GIDHX vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GIDHX (Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both funds - GIDHX is a Derivative Income fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, GIDHX returned 21.66% vs 29.65% for QQQI. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIDHX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

GIDHX vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIDHX achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.11% return.

GIDHX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 6M: 9.77%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 13.41%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 6.82%

QQQI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 13.11%
• 6M: 12.48%
• 1Y: 29.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIDHX vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GIDHX Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund	9.38%	28.92%	-1.90%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.11%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GIDHX and QQQI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.57

The correlation between GIDHX and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GIDHX vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIDHX

GIDHX Risk / Return Rank: 40
GIDHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GIDHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GIDHX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
GIDHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
GIDHX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 66
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIDHX vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIDHX	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.06	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.72	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.38	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	3.10	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.22	13.29	-3.08

GIDHX vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIDHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIDHX and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIDHX vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIDHX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIDHX and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIDHX	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.19%	-20.00%	-16.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.14%	-9.61%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-0.46%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-2.20%	-5.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	2.24%	-0.20%

Volatility

GIDHX vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX) is 4.24%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that GIDHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIDHX	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	7.00%	-2.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.25%	11.66%	-0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	14.51%	-0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	17.44%	-2.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.41%	17.44%	-2.03%

GIDHX vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIDHX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIDHX vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

GIDHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than QQQI's 14.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIDHX Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund	2.66%	2.58%	3.27%	3.56%	0.58%	3.09%	2.65%	3.24%	3.42%	2.54%	3.08%	4.13%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.54%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIDHX and QQQI in my portfolio?

GIDHX and QQQI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIDHX or QQQI?

QQQI has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to GIDHX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIDHX dropped -36.19% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.