PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIDGX vs. DQEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIDGX vs. DQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIDGX achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly higher than DQEIX's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GIDGX has outperformed DQEIX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while DQEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.12% annualized return.


GIDGX

1D
0.18%
1M
4.42%
YTD
11.66%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
10.87%

DQEIX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.84%
YTD
9.70%
6M
11.02%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIDGX vs. DQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
11.66%15.74%20.59%17.92%-12.75%18.46%8.41%19.97%-8.26%15.18%
DQEIX
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund
9.70%24.64%6.54%9.70%-3.72%14.32%5.62%25.80%-5.61%18.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GIDGX and DQEIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.83

The correlation between GIDGX and DQEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIDGX vs. DQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIDGX
GIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

DQEIX
DQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIDGX vs. DQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIDGXDQEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.39

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.36

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.38

8.50

+8.87

GIDGX vs. DQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIDGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the DQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIDGX and DQEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIDGXDQEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.13

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.77

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.69

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.45

+0.24

Drawdowns

GIDGX vs. DQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIDGX drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum DQEIX drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIDGX and DQEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIDGXDQEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.63%

-52.75%

+21.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-9.74%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-13.21%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-18.65%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.63%

-32.69%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.61%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-7.20%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

2.69%

-1.21%

Volatility

GIDGX vs. DQEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) is 2.46%, while BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that GIDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIDGXDQEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

3.23%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

8.43%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

10.79%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.99%

12.87%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.16%

14.62%

-0.46%

GIDGX vs. DQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIDGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DQEIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIDGX vs. DQEIX - Dividend Comparison

GIDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than DQEIX's 12.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DQEIX
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund
12.55%13.55%12.56%7.65%14.39%12.69%1.97%3.41%10.50%5.32%5.83%6.94%
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
5.53%5.92%12.06%4.32%8.89%8.41%1.99%4.85%5.67%3.35%2.97%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIDGX and DQEIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DQEIX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to GIDGX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIDGX dropped -31.63% vs DQEIX's -52.75%.

GIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIDGX and DQEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer