GICPX vs. RTXAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX).
GICPX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Feb 6, 1994. RTXAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 9, 2019.
Performance
GICPX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GICPX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | -10.61% | 13.90% | 26.70% | 34.47% | -37.45% | 21.09% | 35.45% | 8.00% |
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 11.49% | 13.56% | 1.50% | 7.40% | -11.66% | 26.57% | 3.73% | 6.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GICPX achieves a -10.61% return, which is significantly lower than RTXAX's 11.49% return.
GICPX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- -10.61%
- 6M
- -9.77%
- 1Y
- 6.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
RTXAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 24.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GICPX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GICPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GICPX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank
GICPX
RTXAX
GICPX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GICPX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 1.69 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 2.24 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.35 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 1.89 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 10.79 | -9.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GICPX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.69 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.47 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between GICPX and RTXAX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GICPX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison
GICPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.50%, more than RTXAX's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | 15.50% | 13.85% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.18% | 4.21% | 2.37% | 10.11% | 8.42% | 3.16% | 7.08% | 5.73% |
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 2.57% | 2.86% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 3.11% | 1.74% | 1.71% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GICPX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GICPX drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than RTXAX's maximum drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICPX and RTXAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GICPX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.92% | -40.68% | -32.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -13.11% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -24.63% | -19.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.45% | -3.32% | -9.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.23% | -7.96% | -14.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.29% | +0.85% |
Volatility
GICPX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) at 4.12%. This indicates that GICPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GICPX | RTXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 4.12% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 8.24% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.82% | 15.04% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 15.85% | +6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 20.26% | +0.44% |