GICPX vs. GGMMX
GICPX (Gabelli Global Growth Fund) and GGMMX (Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund) are both Global Equities funds from Gabelli. Over the past 5 years, GICPX returned 8.27%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for GGMMX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.90% expense ratio.
Performance
GICPX vs. GGMMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GICPX achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than GGMMX's 17.25% return.
GICPX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 5.41%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- 1Y
- 15.28%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
GGMMX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 21.32%
- 1Y
- 34.75%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- —
GICPX vs. GGMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | 5.41% | 13.90% | 26.70% | 34.47% | -37.45% | 21.09% | 35.45% | 12.15% |
GGMMX Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund | 17.25% | 10.57% | 1.65% | 39.12% | -16.24% | 19.30% | 15.86% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GICPX and GGMMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between GICPX and GGMMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GICPX vs. GGMMX — Risk / Return Rank
GICPX
GGMMX
GICPX vs. GGMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GICPX | GGMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 2.54 | -1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 3.63 | -1.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.42 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 4.24 | -2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 14.61 | -9.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GICPX | GGMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 2.54 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.38 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.59 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
GICPX vs. GGMMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GICPX drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than GGMMX's maximum drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICPX and GGMMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GICPX | GGMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.92% | -40.23% | -32.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -8.11% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -23.46% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -31.83% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.10% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -9.85% | -12.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.35% | +0.76% |
Volatility
GICPX vs. GGMMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) is 3.26%, while Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that GICPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GICPX | GGMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 5.82% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 10.22% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 13.88% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 17.77% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 20.06% | +0.70% |
GICPX vs. GGMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GICPX and GGMMX have an expense ratio of 0.90%.
Dividends
GICPX vs. GGMMX - Dividend Comparison
GICPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.14%, more than GGMMX's 5.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGMMX Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund | 5.77% | 6.77% | 0.00% | 11.14% | 6.22% | 14.98% | 0.54% | 3.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | 13.14% | 13.85% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.18% | 4.21% | 2.37% | 10.11% | 8.42% | 3.16% | 7.08% | 5.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GICPX and GGMMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGMMX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to GICPX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GICPX dropped -72.92% vs GGMMX's -40.23%.
GGMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GICPX and GGMMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer