PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GICPX vs. EMAYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GICPX vs. EMAYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund (EMAYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GICPX achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than EMAYX's 6.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GICPX has outperformed EMAYX with an annualized return of 13.17%, while EMAYX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.


GICPX

1D
-0.88%
1M
2.35%
YTD
4.13%
6M
4.08%
1Y
13.03%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
13.17%

EMAYX

1D
-0.90%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6.93%
6M
8.60%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
5.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GICPX vs. EMAYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GICPX
Gabelli Global Growth Fund
4.13%13.90%26.70%34.47%-37.45%21.09%35.45%30.76%-2.73%29.02%
EMAYX
Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund
6.93%21.17%4.10%5.96%-8.78%9.83%5.29%7.71%-2.78%5.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GICPX and EMAYX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2001

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between GICPX and EMAYX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GICPX vs. EMAYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GICPX
GICPX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
GICPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GICPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GICPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GICPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GICPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

EMAYX
EMAYX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EMAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EMAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GICPX vs. EMAYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund (EMAYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GICPXEMAYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.95

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

16.11

-11.69

GICPX vs. EMAYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GICPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the EMAYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GICPX and EMAYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GICPXEMAYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.45

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.49

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.55

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.45

+0.05

Drawdowns

GICPX vs. EMAYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GICPX drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than EMAYX's maximum drawdown of -47.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICPX and EMAYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GICPXEMAYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.92%

-47.93%

-24.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-5.82%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-12.32%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.93%

-15.95%

-27.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.93%

-24.90%

-19.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.63%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.12%

-4.47%

-17.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.42%

+1.69%

Volatility

GICPX vs. EMAYX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund (EMAYX) at 2.76%. This indicates that GICPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GICPXEMAYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

2.76%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

6.54%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

9.39%

+3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.13%

10.95%

+11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

10.56%

+10.20%

GICPX vs. EMAYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GICPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAYX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GICPX vs. EMAYX - Dividend Comparison

GICPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, more than EMAYX's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMAYX
Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund
3.94%4.21%0.00%3.00%0.80%6.84%0.24%1.80%5.52%1.24%0.00%0.00%
GICPX
Gabelli Global Growth Fund
13.30%13.85%0.00%0.30%0.18%4.21%2.37%10.11%8.42%3.16%7.08%5.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


GICPX and EMAYX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GICPX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to EMAYX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GICPX dropped -72.92% vs EMAYX's -47.93%.

EMAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GICPX and EMAYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer