PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GICIX vs. YASLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GICIX vs. YASLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GICIX having a 14.59% return and YASLX slightly lower at 14.10%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GICIX having a 10.83% annualized return and YASLX not far ahead at 11.33%.


GICIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.26%
YTD
14.59%
6M
13.81%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
10.83%

YASLX

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
14.10%
6M
15.27%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
11.68%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GICIX vs. YASLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
14.59%42.83%5.57%15.11%-18.53%13.03%7.69%21.59%-18.80%33.05%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
14.10%6.27%11.23%3.65%-13.59%24.45%12.82%17.07%-10.15%34.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GICIX and YASLX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.67

The correlation between GICIX and YASLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GICIX vs. YASLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GICIX
GICIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

YASLX
YASLX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
YASLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YASLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
YASLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
YASLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
YASLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GICIX vs. YASLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GICIXYASLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.24

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

1.41

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

4.03

+5.98

GICIX vs. YASLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GICIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the YASLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GICIX and YASLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GICIX vs. YASLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GICIX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, which is greater than YASLX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICIX and YASLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GICIXYASLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.71%

-38.91%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.39%

-10.18%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.39%

-16.65%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.53%

-27.74%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.84%

-38.91%

-4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-3.13%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.91%

-8.19%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.56%

+0.03%

Volatility

GICIX vs. YASLX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) at 3.13%. This indicates that GICIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YASLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GICIXYASLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

3.13%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

8.75%

+4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

11.14%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

16.33%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

15.03%

+1.74%

GICIX vs. YASLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GICIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than YASLX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GICIX vs. YASLX - Dividend Comparison

GICIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, while YASLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
7.06%8.08%4.77%3.04%3.10%3.39%1.87%3.47%1.68%8.29%2.79%1.69%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%15.82%8.97%0.94%3.85%2.62%12.95%9.89%4.86%3.28%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GICIX and YASLX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GICIX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to YASLX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GICIX dropped -56.71% vs YASLX's -38.91%.

GICIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GICIX and YASLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer