PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YASLX vs. FTISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YASLX vs. FTISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) and Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M (FTISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YASLX achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly higher than FTISX's 5.81% return. Over the past 10 years, YASLX has outperformed FTISX with an annualized return of 10.69%, while FTISX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.80% annualized return.


YASLX

1D
0.71%
1M
3.32%
6M
8.97%
YTD
17.51%
1Y
17.62%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
10.69%
ALL TIME*
8.87%

FTISX

1D
2.21%
1M
-2.32%
6M
1.34%
YTD
5.81%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
7.80%
ALL TIME*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

YASLX vs. FTISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
17.51%6.27%11.23%3.65%-13.59%24.45%12.82%17.07%-10.15%34.85%
FTISX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M
5.81%24.03%-0.46%18.97%-17.12%12.83%9.29%20.77%-16.57%31.41%

Correlation

The correlation between YASLX and FTISX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.70

The correlation between YASLX and FTISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YASLX vs. FTISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YASLX
YASLX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
YASLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YASLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
YASLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
YASLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
YASLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FTISX
FTISX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FTISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTISX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FTISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTISX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YASLX vs. FTISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) and Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M (FTISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YASLXFTISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.10

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.91

3.55

+1.36

YASLX vs. FTISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YASLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the FTISX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YASLX and FTISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YASLX vs. FTISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YASLX drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, smaller than the maximum FTISX drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YASLX and FTISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YASLXFTISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-61.12%

+22.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-10.75%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.65%

-12.95%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.74%

-31.45%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

-39.55%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-4.83%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-10.93%

+2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

3.33%

+0.32%

Volatility

YASLX vs. FTISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) is 2.38%, while Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M (FTISX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that YASLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YASLXFTISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

4.76%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

11.96%

-4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

13.71%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

13.80%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

13.94%

+1.03%

YASLX vs. FTISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YASLX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FTISX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

YASLX vs. FTISX - Dividend Comparison

YASLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTISX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class M
3.09%3.26%2.24%1.40%0.13%6.94%0.34%1.81%5.50%2.52%2.08%2.86%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%15.82%8.97%0.94%3.85%2.62%12.95%9.89%4.86%3.28%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


YASLX and FTISX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTISX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to YASLX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YASLX dropped -38.91% vs FTISX's -61.12%.

YASLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YASLX and FTISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer