GICIX vs. GSMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX).
GICIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Sep 27, 2007. GSMIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 19, 1993.
Performance
GICIX vs. GSMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GICIX vs. GSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICIX Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund | -0.43% | 42.83% | 5.57% | 15.11% | -18.53% | 13.03% | 7.69% | 21.59% | -18.80% | 33.05% |
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund | -0.49% | 4.12% | 3.03% | 6.41% | -9.77% | 2.80% | 3.57% | 7.49% | 2.83% | 5.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GICIX achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly higher than GSMIX's -0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GICIX has outperformed GSMIX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while GSMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.
GICIX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
GSMIX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GICIX vs. GSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GICIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than GSMIX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GICIX vs. GSMIX — Risk / Return Rank
GICIX
GSMIX
GICIX vs. GSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GICIX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 0.92 | +1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 1.26 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 0.88 | +1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 3.14 | +6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GICIX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 0.92 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.26 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.62 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.95 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between GICIX and GSMIX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GICIX vs. GSMIX - Dividend Comparison
GICIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than GSMIX's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICIX Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund | 8.12% | 8.08% | 4.77% | 3.04% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 1.87% | 3.47% | 1.68% | 8.29% | 2.79% | 1.69% |
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund | 3.52% | 4.32% | 3.31% | 2.82% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.57% | 2.79% | 2.99% | 3.35% | 3.43% |
Drawdowns
GICIX vs. GSMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GICIX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, which is greater than GSMIX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICIX and GSMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GICIX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.71% | -15.43% | -41.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -4.44% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.53% | -14.33% | -20.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.84% | -14.33% | -29.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.39% | -2.39% | -11.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.00% | -2.41% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 1.25% | +2.00% |
Volatility
GICIX vs. GSMIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) at 0.88%. This indicates that GICIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GICIX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 0.88% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 1.46% | +9.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 4.48% | +11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 3.64% | +12.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 3.90% | +12.75% |