PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSMIX vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSMIX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSMIX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, GSMIX has outperformed FXNAX with an annualized return of 2.22%, while FXNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.25% annualized return.


GSMIX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.56%
6M
-0.01%
YTD
0.75%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
2.22%
ALL TIME*
3.48%

FXNAX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.63%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
1.25%
ALL TIME*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSMIX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSMIX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund
0.75%4.12%3.03%6.41%-9.77%2.80%3.57%7.49%2.83%5.55%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
-0.63%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GSMIX and FXNAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.39

The correlation between GSMIX and FXNAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (10 years) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSMIX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSMIX
GSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSMIX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSMIXFXNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.14

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.01

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

2.55

+5.16

GSMIX vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSMIX and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSMIX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSMIX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMIX and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSMIXFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.43%

-19.51%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-2.94%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.81%

-5.11%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.33%

-18.54%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.33%

-19.51%

+5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-3.89%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-3.86%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.17%

-0.45%

Volatility

GSMIX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) is 0.75%, while Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that GSMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSMIXFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.99%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.92%

3.02%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41%

3.85%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

6.07%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.92%

5.01%

-1.09%

GSMIX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSMIX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

GSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than FXNAX's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.46%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%
GSMIX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund
3.23%4.32%3.31%2.82%1.86%1.92%2.11%2.57%2.79%2.99%3.35%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSMIX and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXNAX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to GSMIX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSMIX dropped -15.43% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

GSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSMIX and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer