GIC vs. TMUS
GIC (Global Industrial Company) and TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) are both stocks. GIC operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, GIC returned 21.48%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for TMUS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIC vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIC achieves a 11.00% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GIC has outperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 21.48%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively lower 16.66% annualized return.
GIC
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 21.48%
TMUS
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
GIC vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 11.00% | 22.45% | -34.29% | 69.66% | -41.04% | 18.77% | 62.74% | 7.69% | -1.33% | 286.91% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -5.91% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIC and TMUS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GIC and TMUS has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GIC:
$1.22B
TMUS:
$208.40B
GIC:
$1.96
TMUS:
$9.41
GIC:
16.28
TMUS:
20.09
GIC:
15.54
TMUS:
0.31
GIC:
0.87
TMUS:
2.34
GIC:
2.10
TMUS:
3.73
GIC:
$1.41B
TMUS:
$90.53B
GIC:
$500.00M
TMUS:
$34.92B
GIC:
$106.30M
TMUS:
$28.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIC vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
GIC
TMUS
GIC vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Industrial Company (GIC) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIC | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.91 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | -0.52 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | -0.88 | +2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIC vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIC drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than TMUS's maximum drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIC and TMUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIC | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -86.29% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.04% | -30.37% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.19% | -33.65% | -19.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.19% | -33.65% | -19.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.74% | -33.65% | -22.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.96% | -29.12% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -25.96% | -32.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.02% | 17.87% | -1.85% |
Volatility
GIC vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global Industrial Company (GIC) is 4.33%, while T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a volatility of 7.72%. This indicates that GIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIC | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 7.72% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.62% | 19.08% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.31% | 24.99% | +16.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.21% | 23.90% | +15.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 26.08% | +20.28% |
Dividends
GIC vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
GIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than TMUS's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 3.39% | 3.56% | 4.03% | 2.06% | 3.06% | 4.01% | 9.92% | 1.91% | 39.51% | 1.05% | 1.14% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.08% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GIC vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Industrial Company and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIC vs. TMUS - Profitability Comparison
GIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a gross profit of 121.90M and revenue of 350.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
TMUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported an operating income of 20.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
TMUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
GIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a net income of 16.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
TMUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIC and TMUS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMUS has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to GIC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIC dropped -98.09% vs TMUS's -86.29%.
GIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIC and TMUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer