GIB vs. NFLX
GIB (CGI Inc) and NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) are both stocks. GIB operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while NFLX operates in Entertainment (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, GIB returned 4.25%/yr vs 22.59%/yr for NFLX. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GIB vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIB achieves a -20.45% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -23.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GIB has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 4.25%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.59% annualized return.
GIB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 11.73%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- YTD
- -20.45%
- 1Y
- -23.67%
- 3Y*
- -9.95%
- 5Y*
- -4.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
NFLX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- 6M
- -14.11%
- YTD
- -23.52%
- 1Y
- -38.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 22.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 30.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | $41.80M | $36.08M | $33.67M |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | $3.27B | $3.56B | $3.41B |
GIB vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | -20.45% | -15.19% | 2.07% | 24.47% | -2.68% | 11.59% | -5.26% | 36.80% | 12.63% | 13.12% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -23.52% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 67.11% | 20.89% | 39.44% | 55.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIB and NFLX is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002 | 0.22 |
The correlation between GIB and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIB:
$15.64B
NFLX:
$298.60B
GIB:
CA$7.71
NFLX:
$3.17
GIB:
13.29
NFLX:
22.61
GIB:
1.67
NFLX:
0.90
GIB:
1.36
NFLX:
6.38
GIB:
2.18
NFLX:
10.13
GIB:
CA$16.35B
NFLX:
$48.37B
GIB:
CA$3.35B
NFLX:
$23.76B
GIB:
CA$2.98B
NFLX:
$30.55B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIB vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank
GIB
NFLX
GIB vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIB | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.80 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.82 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | -1.45 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIB vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIB drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, which is greater than NFLX's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB and NFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIB | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.78% | -81.99% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.77% | -46.49% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.54% | -49.52% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.54% | -75.95% | +26.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -75.95% | +26.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.76% | -46.45% | +6.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.55% | -25.02% | -7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.44% | 26.37% | -5.93% |
Volatility
GIB vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison
CGI Inc (GIB) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) have volatilities of 10.64% and 11.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIB | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.64% | 11.07% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.97% | 27.83% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.79% | 34.79% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.49% | 43.50% | -20.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 41.35% | -18.59% |
Dividends
GIB vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison
GIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.10% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GIB vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIB vs. NFLX - Profitability Comparison
GIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
NFLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.52B and revenue of 12.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.
GIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
NFLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.19B and revenue of 12.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.4%.
GIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 445.87M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
NFLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 3.40B and revenue of 12.56B, resulting in a net margin of 27.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIB and NFLX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLX has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to GIB (10.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIB dropped -86.78% vs NFLX's -81.99%.
GIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIB and NFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer