GHYB vs. GEMD
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) and Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD).
GHYB and GEMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GHYB is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 5, 2017. GEMD is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets USD Bond Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. Both GHYB and GEMD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GHYB vs. GEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GHYB vs. GEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.32% | 9.38% | 7.76% | 12.13% | -6.77% |
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | -1.32% | 13.67% | 3.31% | 8.51% | -15.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHYB achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly higher than GEMD's -1.32% return.
GHYB
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- —
GEMD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GHYB vs. GEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHYB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GEMD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GHYB vs. GEMD — Risk / Return Rank
GHYB
GEMD
GHYB vs. GEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) and Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHYB | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 1.94 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.01 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 8.23 | +1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHYB | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.14 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between GHYB and GEMD is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GHYB vs. GEMD - Dividend Comparison
GHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than GEMD's 6.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.09% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% |
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.55% | 6.32% | 5.79% | 5.70% | 5.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GHYB vs. GEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHYB drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, smaller than the maximum GEMD drawdown of -24.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYB and GEMD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHYB | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | -24.56% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.12% | -4.64% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -3.32% | +2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -8.48% | +5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 1.13% | -0.33% |
Volatility
GHYB vs. GEMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) is 2.06%, while Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that GHYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GHYB | GEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 3.02% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 4.14% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.54% | 6.52% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.68% | 10.08% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.35% | 10.08% | -1.73% |