GHTA vs. VBIL
GHTA (Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF) and VBIL (Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GHTA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Goose Hollow, while VBIL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index. GHTA is actively managed, while VBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, GHTA returned 6.36% vs 3.91% for VBIL. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. GHTA charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VBIL.
Performance
GHTA vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHTA achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than VBIL's 1.70% return.
GHTA
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VBIL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHTA vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 1.97% | 5.82% |
VBIL Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF | 1.70% | 3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHTA and VBIL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHTA vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank
GHTA
VBIL
GHTA vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHTA | VBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -110.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 39.66 | -38.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 296.41 | -295.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 1,809.33 | -1,806.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHTA vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, which is greater than VBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and VBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHTA | VBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -0.09% | -13.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -0.01% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | 0.00% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -0.00% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 0.00% | +2.53% |
Volatility
GHTA vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that GHTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHTA | VBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 0.05% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.76% | 0.16% | +5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.92% | 0.22% | +7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 0.30% | +11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 0.30% | +11.60% |
GHTA vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHTA vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison
GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than VBIL's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 3.76% | 3.84% | 2.46% | 2.32% | 0.38% | 0.41% |
VBIL Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF | 3.65% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHTA and VBIL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHTA has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to VBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHTA dropped -13.92% vs VBIL's -0.09%.
On 1-year performance, GHTA leads with 6.36% vs 3.91% for VBIL. On fees, VBIL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GHTA has performed better with a 6.36% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBIL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for GHTA.
GHTA has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 3.65% for VBIL.
GHTA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VBIL is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Goose Hollow and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for GHTA and 0.07% for VBIL.
VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.07 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHTA and VBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer