PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHC vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GHC vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Graham Holdings Company (GHC) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHC achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 74.31% return.


GHC

1D
1.55%
1M
7.43%
YTD
7.23%
6M
5.38%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
28.02%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
10.04%

CRDO

1D
-5.27%
1M
45.68%
YTD
74.31%
6M
74.28%
1Y
241.28%
3Y*
142.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHC vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GHC
Graham Holdings Company
7.23%26.98%26.32%16.56%4.95%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
74.31%114.09%245.20%46.28%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GHC and CRDO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.22

Over the past year, the correlation between GHC and CRDO has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GHC:

$7.77M

CRDO:

$48.33B

EPS

GHC:

$90.63

CRDO:

$2.50

PE Ratio

GHC:

12.96

CRDO:

100.50

PEG Ratio

GHC:

0.15

CRDO:

0.09

PS Ratio

GHC:

1.03

CRDO:

35.55

PB Ratio

GHC:

0.00

CRDO:

23.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

GHC:

$3.75B

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GHC:

$1.10B

CRDO:

$908.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

GHC:

$722.08M

CRDO:

$463.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHC vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHC
GHC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHC vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graham Holdings Company (GHC) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GHCCRDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

4.46

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.29

10.76

-7.47

GHC vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHC Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHC and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GHC vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHC drawdown since its inception was -67.54%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHC and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHCCRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.54%

-62.04%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.78%

-53.59%

+33.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.78%

-61.05%

+41.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-5.27%

+3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-19.38%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.51%

22.17%

-14.66%

Volatility

GHC vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is 5.31%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 28.41%. This indicates that GHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHCCRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

28.41%

-23.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

65.16%

-49.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.54%

85.70%

-59.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.03%

81.50%

-55.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.28%

81.50%

-53.22%

Dividends

GHC vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

GHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GHC
Graham Holdings Company
0.63%0.66%0.79%0.95%1.05%0.96%1.09%0.87%0.83%0.91%0.95%89.61%

Financials

GHC vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graham Holdings Company and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B202220232024202520260
437.00M
(GHC) Total Revenue
(CRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GHC and CRDO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (28.41%) compared to GHC (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHC dropped -67.54% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHC and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer