GGUS vs. BIBL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GGUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GGUS tracks the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross while BIBL tracks the Inspire 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GGUS returned 17.87% vs 40.13% for BIBL. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.

Performance

GGUS vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 24.57% return.

GGUS

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: -2.70%
• YTD: 3.10%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 17.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIBL

• 1D: -2.18%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 24.57%
• 6M: 23.10%
• 1Y: 40.13%
• 3Y*: 22.41%
• 5Y*: 10.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGUS vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF	3.10%	17.32%	30.88%	4.54%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	24.57%	17.27%	12.49%	7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GGUS and BIBL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	0.74

The correlation between GGUS and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGUS vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GGUS	BIBL
Technology	48.7%	31.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	0.3%
Communication Services	9.7%	-
Healthcare	9.5%	4.1%
Industrials	6.5%	27.2%
Financial Services	6.5%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	0.4%
Utilities	1.3%	3.3%
Real Estate	0.6%	13.7%
Energy	0.5%	6.0%
Basic Materials	0.4%	4.3%

Return for Risk

GGUS vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGUS

GGUS Risk / Return Rank: 31
GGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
GGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
GGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 30

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 82
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGUS vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGUS	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.45	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	3.25	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.42	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	4.51	-3.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	19.18	-15.13

GGUS vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGUS and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGUS vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGUS	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-36.12%	+13.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.91%	-8.94%	-5.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.38%	-2.18%	-3.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.21%	-7.00%	+3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	2.10%	+2.32%

Volatility

GGUS vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) is 5.77%, while Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that GGUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGUS	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	6.91%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	13.67%	-1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.70%	16.47%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	19.76%	-0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	21.11%	-2.05%

GGUS vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGUS vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than BIBL's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.95%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF	0.43%	0.43%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGUS and BIBL in my portfolio?

GGUS and BIBL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGUS or BIBL?

BIBL has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to GGUS (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGUS dropped -22.59% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

Which ETF is better, GGUS or BIBL?

On 1-year performance, BIBL leads with 40.13% vs 17.87% for GGUS. On fees, GGUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GGUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GGUS or BIBL?

Over the 1-year period, BIBL has performed better with a 40.13% return vs 17.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GGUS or BIBL?

GGUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GGUS or BIBL?

BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.43% for GGUS.

What is the main difference between GGUS and BIBL?

GGUS tracks Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GGUS and 0.35% for BIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.