GGRP vs. PZG
GGRP (The Glimpse Group, Inc.) and PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) are both stocks. GGRP operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, GGRP returned -40.55%/yr vs 50.79%/yr for PZG. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GGRP vs. PZG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGRP achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly lower than PZG's -14.29% return.
GGRP
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -15.38%
- 6M
- -5.58%
- 1Y
- -41.08%
- 3Y*
- -40.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZG
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- -18.80%
- YTD
- -14.29%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 79.79%
- 3Y*
- 50.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- -3.55%
GGRP vs. PZG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRP The Glimpse Group, Inc. | -15.38% | -62.51% | 118.58% | -62.71% | -69.27% | -16.09% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -14.29% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -27.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRP and PZG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
GGRP:
$16.52M
PZG:
$89.78M
GGRP:
-$0.72
PZG:
-$0.09
GGRP:
6.10
PZG:
2.54
GGRP:
$6.85M
PZG:
$0.00
GGRP:
$4.52M
PZG:
-$892.14K
GGRP:
-$4.34M
PZG:
-$11.01M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGRP vs. PZG — Risk / Return Rank
GGRP
PZG
GGRP vs. PZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) and Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGRP | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.22 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 1.35 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 3.17 | -4.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGRP vs. PZG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRP drawdown since its inception was -97.25%, roughly equal to the maximum PZG drawdown of -93.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRP and PZG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRP | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.25% | -93.81% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.15% | -59.55% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.23% | -59.55% | -28.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.56% | -75.57% | -19.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.03% | -68.57% | -12.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.64% | 25.24% | +20.40% |
Volatility
GGRP vs. PZG - Volatility Comparison
The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) has a higher volatility of 28.23% compared to Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) at 20.94%. This indicates that GGRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGRP | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.23% | 20.94% | +7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.99% | 59.22% | +6.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.20% | 73.19% | +17.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.96% | 63.16% | +47.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.96% | 60.84% | +50.12% |
Dividends
GGRP vs. PZG - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGRP nor PZG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GGRP vs. PZG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Glimpse Group, Inc. and Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GGRP and PZG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGRP has higher volatility (28.23%) compared to PZG (20.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGRP dropped -97.25% vs PZG's -93.81%.
PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGRP and PZG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer