GGRP vs. FUL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GGRP (The Glimpse Group, Inc.) and FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) are both stocks. GGRP operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, GGRP returned -39.04%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for FUL. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GGRP vs. FUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRP achieves a -8.75% return, which is significantly lower than FUL's 8.99% return.

GGRP

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: -8.75%
• 6M: -4.02%
• 1Y: -38.77%
• 3Y*: -39.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUL

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 11.30%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 7.33%
• 1Y: 19.72%
• 3Y*: 1.97%
• 5Y*: 0.84%
• 10Y*: 5.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRP vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GGRP The Glimpse Group, Inc.	-8.75%	-62.51%	118.58%	-62.71%	-69.27%	-16.09%
FUL H.B. Fuller Company	8.99%	-10.46%	-16.19%	14.97%	-10.59%	28.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRP and FUL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap GGRP : $17.81M FUL : $3.57B
EPS GGRP : -$0.72 FUL : $2.88
PS Ratio GGRP : 2.58 FUL : 1.03
PB Ratio GGRP : 6.58 FUL : 1.73
Total Revenue (TTM) GGRP : $6.85M FUL : $3.46B
Gross Profit (TTM) GGRP : $4.52M FUL : $1.11B
EBITDA (TTM) GGRP : -$4.34M FUL : $495.48M

Return for Risk

GGRP vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGRP

GGRP Risk / Return Rank: 26
GGRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GGRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GGRP Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GGRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GGRP Martin Ratio Rank: 25

FUL

FUL Risk / Return Rank: 59
FUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FUL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FUL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRP vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGRP	FUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	0.57	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	1.12	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.13	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	0.73	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	2.28	-3.13

GGRP vs. FUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRP Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the FUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRP and FUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGRP vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRP drawdown since its inception was -97.25%, which is greater than FUL's maximum drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRP and FUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGRP	FUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.25%	-68.25%	-29.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.15%	-26.97%	-46.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-88.23%	-43.45%	-44.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.45%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.22%	-23.39%	-71.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.00%	-18.76%	-62.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.37%	8.68%	+36.69%

Volatility

GGRP vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison

The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) has a higher volatility of 26.95% compared to H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) at 10.97%. This indicates that GGRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGRP	FUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.95%	10.97%	+15.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.50%	26.66%	+38.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.07%	34.75%	+55.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	110.98%	29.45%	+81.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	110.98%	31.15%	+79.83%

Dividends

GGRP vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison

GGRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FUL H.B. Fuller Company	1.48%	1.56%	1.29%	0.99%	1.03%	0.82%	1.25%	1.23%	1.44%	1.10%	1.14%	1.40%
GGRP The Glimpse Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGRP and FUL in my portfolio?

GGRP and FUL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGRP or FUL?

GGRP has higher volatility (26.95%) compared to FUL (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGRP dropped -97.25% vs FUL's -68.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.