GGRO.TO vs. SOXS
GGRO.TO (iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares, while SOXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). GGRO.TO is actively managed, while SOXS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGRO.TO returned 11.34%/yr vs -80.02%/yr for SOXS. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions. GGRO.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
GGRO.TO vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GGRO.TO is traded in CAD, while SOXS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SOXS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGRO.TO achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -93.52% return.
GGRO.TO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 25.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXS
- 1D
- -16.37%
- 1M
- -56.46%
- YTD
- -93.52%
- 6M
- -93.88%
- 1Y
- -97.93%
- 3Y*
- -86.70%
- 5Y*
- -80.02%
- 10Y*
- -79.35%
GGRO.TO vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRO.TO iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio | 13.16% | 14.25% | 20.49% | 19.17% | -14.12% | 15.53% | 7.20% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -93.52% | -86.19% | -56.12% | -84.93% | 23.09% | -80.95% | -62.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRO.TO and SOXS is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2020 | -0.53 |
The correlation between GGRO.TO and SOXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGRO.TO vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
GGRO.TO
SOXS
GGRO.TO vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGRO.TO | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.61 | +0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | -1.00 | +4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | -1.48 | +14.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGRO.TO vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.12%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRO.TO and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRO.TO | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -100.00% | +77.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -97.81% | +90.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.77% | -99.84% | +86.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -99.97% | +77.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -100.00% | +100.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -92.77% | +87.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 67.69% | -65.75% |
Volatility
GGRO.TO vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) is 4.56%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 59.85%. This indicates that GGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGRO.TO | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 59.85% | -55.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 96.33% | -86.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 112.61% | -100.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 110.35% | -95.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 101.78% | -85.43% |
GGRO.TO vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRO.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGRO.TO vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
GGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than SOXS's 84.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRO.TO iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.63% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 84.95% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGRO.TO and SOXS have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.
GGRO.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GGRO.TO and 1.08% for SOXS.
Find the right allocation for GGRO.TO and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer