PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GGRO.TOXEQT.TO
YTD Return19.91%20.01%
1Y Return29.50%27.91%
3Y Return (Ann)6.94%7.78%
Sharpe Ratio3.373.05
Sortino Ratio4.844.25
Omega Ratio1.671.57
Calmar Ratio4.164.36
Martin Ratio24.6622.68
Ulcer Index1.27%1.27%
Daily Std Dev9.24%9.48%
Max Drawdown-22.13%-29.74%
Current Drawdown-1.50%-2.06%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between GGRO.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

GGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GGRO.TO having a 19.91% return and XEQT.TO slightly higher at 20.01%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.21%
7.58%
GGRO.TO
XEQT.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRO.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio
Expense ratio chart for GGRO.TO: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for XEQT.TO: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGRO.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 3.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.49
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.95
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 17.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0017.49
XEQT.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XEQT.TO, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XEQT.TO, currently valued at 3.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.27
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XEQT.TO, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.42
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XEQT.TO, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XEQT.TO, currently valued at 16.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0016.51

GGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is comparable to the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRO.TO and XEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.61
2.33
GGRO.TO
XEQT.TO

Dividends

GGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

GGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than XEQT.TO's 1.86% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019
GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio
1.71%1.89%1.69%1.43%0.83%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.86%2.09%2.14%1.65%1.68%1.20%

Drawdowns

GGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, smaller than the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRO.TO and XEQT.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.21%
-2.77%
GGRO.TO
XEQT.TO

Volatility

GGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) have volatilities of 2.37% and 2.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.37%
2.49%
GGRO.TO
XEQT.TO