PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GGRO.TO vs. GEQT.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GGRO.TOGEQT.TO
YTD Return22.92%28.10%
1Y Return32.49%38.67%
3Y Return (Ann)7.67%10.30%
Sharpe Ratio3.463.33
Sortino Ratio4.984.53
Omega Ratio1.691.66
Calmar Ratio4.455.80
Martin Ratio25.4526.57
Ulcer Index1.28%1.45%
Daily Std Dev9.39%11.60%
Max Drawdown-22.13%-23.64%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between GGRO.TO and GEQT.TO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

GGRO.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GGRO.TO achieves a 22.92% return, which is significantly lower than GEQT.TO's 28.10% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.31%
13.44%
GGRO.TO
GEQT.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GGRO.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GGRO.TO and GEQT.TO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio
Expense ratio chart for GGRO.TO: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for GEQT.TO: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GGRO.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGRO.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 3.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.88
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GGRO.TO, currently valued at 18.35, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.35
GEQT.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GEQT.TO, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GEQT.TO, currently valued at 3.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GEQT.TO, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GEQT.TO, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GEQT.TO, currently valued at 19.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0019.23

GGRO.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is comparable to the GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRO.TO and GEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.76
2.83
GGRO.TO
GEQT.TO

Dividends

GGRO.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

GGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than GEQT.TO's 1.34% yield.


TTM2023202220212020
GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio
1.67%1.89%1.69%1.43%0.83%
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio
1.34%1.58%1.82%1.32%0.87%

Drawdowns

GGRO.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, smaller than the maximum GEQT.TO drawdown of -23.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRO.TO and GEQT.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.16%
-0.13%
GGRO.TO
GEQT.TO

Volatility

GGRO.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO) is 2.70%, while iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that GGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.70%
3.53%
GGRO.TO
GEQT.TO