GGRG.L vs. WRDA.L
GGRG.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - GGRG.L tracks the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth while WRDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GGRG.L returned 17.64% vs 27.42% for WRDA.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GGRG.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.
Performance
GGRG.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGRG.L achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's 10.16% return.
GGRG.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- —
WRDA.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGRG.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GGRG.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 5.29% | 8.36% | 10.10% |
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.16% | 12.77% | 20.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRG.L and WRDA.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between GGRG.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGRG.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGRG.L
WRDA.L
GGRG.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGRG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.52 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 4.18 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 16.68 | -8.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGRG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.72 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.51 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
GGRG.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.15%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRG.L and WRDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -18.38% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | -6.53% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -2.27% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 1.64% | +0.62% |
Volatility
GGRG.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that GGRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGRG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.49% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 7.16% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 10.03% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.13% | 12.34% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 12.34% | +1.18% |
GGRG.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRG.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGRG.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGRG.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GGRG.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRG.L.
GGRG.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRG.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.
Find the right allocation for GGRG.L and WRDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer