GGRG.L vs. GGRP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L).
GGRG.L and GGRP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGRG.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. It was launched on Jun 3, 2016. GGRP.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. It was launched on Nov 2, 2016. Both GGRG.L and GGRP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GGRG.L or GGRP.L.
Key characteristics
| GGRG.L | GGRP.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.82% | 11.72% |
| 1Y Return | 18.12% | 17.96% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.13% | 7.15% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.87% | 10.90% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.11 | 2.06 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.04 | 2.96 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.37 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.09 | 4.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.75 | 13.81 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.29% | 1.24% |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.37% | 8.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.15% | -22.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.14% | -0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRG.L and GGRP.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GGRG.L vs. GGRP.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GGRG.L having a 11.82% return and GGRP.L slightly lower at 11.72%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGRG.L vs. GGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GGRG.L and GGRP.L have an expense ratio of 0.38%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GGRG.L vs. GGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GGRG.L vs. GGRP.L - Dividend Comparison
GGRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRG.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGRP.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 1.61% | 1.86% | 2.42% | 1.60% | 1.47% | 1.88% | 2.13% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
GGRG.L vs. GGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.15%, roughly equal to the maximum GGRP.L drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRG.L and GGRP.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GGRG.L vs. GGRP.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.