PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRA.L achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than FGQI.L's 9.49% return.


GGRA.L

1D
0.16%
1M
3.46%
YTD
5.13%
6M
6.21%
1Y
16.41%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*

FGQI.L

1D
0.09%
1M
2.82%
YTD
9.49%
6M
10.07%
1Y
24.94%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
5.13%16.19%8.94%18.40%-13.65%19.40%16.48%34.97%-11.18%20.33%
FGQI.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD
9.49%20.05%11.82%18.07%-10.84%22.20%10.14%27.80%-7.55%16.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRA.L and FGQI.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017

0.90

The correlation between GGRA.L and FGQI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GGRA.L
FGQI.L

Technology

21.6%
29.4%

Industrials

18.8%
12.3%

Healthcare

15.7%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
8.5%

Communication Services

8.6%
8.3%

Financial Services

8.4%
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
4.7%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.2%

Utilities

0.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.9%

Energy

0.0%
4.0%

Technology

GGRA.L
21.6%
FGQI.L
29.4%

Industrials

GGRA.L
18.8%
FGQI.L
12.3%

Healthcare

GGRA.L
15.7%
FGQI.L
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GGRA.L
15.4%
FGQI.L
8.5%

Communication Services

GGRA.L
8.6%
FGQI.L
8.3%

Financial Services

GGRA.L
8.4%
FGQI.L
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

GGRA.L
7.2%
FGQI.L
4.7%

Basic Materials

GGRA.L
3.7%
FGQI.L
3.2%

Utilities

GGRA.L
0.4%
FGQI.L
2.5%

Real Estate

GGRA.L
0.2%
FGQI.L
1.9%

Energy

GGRA.L
0.0%
FGQI.L
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGRA.L
GGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FGQI.L
FGQI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FGQI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGRA.LFGQI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.09

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

12.76

-6.38

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the FGQI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRA.L and FGQI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGRA.LFGQI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.05

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.71

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.78

0.00

Drawdowns

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum FGQI.L drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRA.L and FGQI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGRA.LFGQI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-35.04%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-8.04%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-15.80%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-22.08%

-2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.09%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-4.12%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.95%

+0.62%

Volatility

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) at 3.28%. This indicates that GGRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGQI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGRA.LFGQI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.28%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

9.16%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

12.18%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

14.99%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

15.77%

-0.86%

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRA.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FGQI.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGRA.L vs. FGQI.L - Dividend Comparison

GGRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGQI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQI.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD
1.80%1.81%2.32%2.71%2.77%2.52%2.45%2.34%2.78%1.50%
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGRA.L and FGQI.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGRA.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGRA.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQI.L.

GGRA.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while FGQI.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRA.L and 0.40% for FGQI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGRA.L and FGQI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer