PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FGQI.L is traded in USD, while FUSS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FUSS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGQI.L having a 9.49% return and FUSS.L slightly higher at 9.91%.


FGQI.L

1D
0.09%
1M
2.82%
YTD
9.49%
6M
10.07%
1Y
24.94%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*

FUSS.L

1D
0.26%
1M
3.85%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.63%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FGQI.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD
9.49%20.05%11.82%18.07%-10.84%22.20%18.18%
FUSS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc
9.91%18.13%26.20%28.75%-21.26%27.29%23.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQI.L and FUSS.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.81

The correlation between FGQI.L and FUSS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQI.L
FGQI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FGQI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FUSS.L
FUSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FUSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGQI.LFUSS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.99

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.76

12.78

-0.02

FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FUSS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQI.L and FUSS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGQI.LFUSS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.40

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.85

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.06

-0.28

Drawdowns

FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQI.L drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, which is greater than FUSS.L's maximum drawdown of -26.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQI.L and FUSS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGQI.LFUSS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-26.68%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-9.57%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.80%

-20.09%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.08%

-26.68%

+4.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.33%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-5.54%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.24%

-0.29%

Volatility

FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L) at 2.52%. This indicates that FGQI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGQI.LFUSS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.52%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

8.38%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

11.93%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

16.19%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

16.41%

-0.64%

FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQI.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FUSS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGQI.L vs. FUSS.L - Dividend Comparison

FGQI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while FUSS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQI.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD
1.80%1.81%2.32%2.71%2.77%2.52%2.45%2.34%2.78%1.50%
FUSS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGQI.L and FUSS.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUSS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUSS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQI.L.

FGQI.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while FUSS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. FGQI.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income Index, while FUSS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQI.L and 0.30% for FUSS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGQI.L and FUSS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer