PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRA.L achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than 3USL.L's 25.13% return.


GGRA.L

1D
0.16%
1M
3.46%
YTD
5.13%
6M
6.21%
1Y
16.41%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*

3USL.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
12.76%
YTD
25.13%
6M
26.49%
1Y
77.77%
3Y*
50.50%
5Y*
22.25%
10Y*
28.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
5.13%16.19%8.94%18.40%-13.65%19.40%16.48%34.97%-11.18%29.07%
3USL.L
WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB
25.13%28.97%64.00%70.49%-57.35%101.77%7.89%97.98%-27.34%69.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRA.L and 3USL.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.89

The correlation between GGRA.L and 3USL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GGRA.L
3USL.L

Technology

21.6%
36.9%

Industrials

18.8%
7.4%

Healthcare

15.7%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
10.7%

Communication Services

8.6%
10.4%

Financial Services

8.4%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
4.7%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.5%

Utilities

0.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.8%

Energy

0.0%
2.8%

Technology

GGRA.L
21.6%
3USL.L
36.9%

Industrials

GGRA.L
18.8%
3USL.L
7.4%

Healthcare

GGRA.L
15.7%
3USL.L
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GGRA.L
15.4%
3USL.L
10.7%

Communication Services

GGRA.L
8.6%
3USL.L
10.4%

Financial Services

GGRA.L
8.4%
3USL.L
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

GGRA.L
7.2%
3USL.L
4.7%

Basic Materials

GGRA.L
3.7%
3USL.L
1.5%

Utilities

GGRA.L
0.4%
3USL.L
2.3%

Real Estate

GGRA.L
0.2%
3USL.L
1.8%

Energy

GGRA.L
0.0%
3USL.L
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGRA.L
GGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

3USL.L
3USL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
3USL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3USL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
3USL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3USL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
3USL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGRA.L3USL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.06

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

12.28

-5.90

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the 3USL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRA.L and 3USL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGRA.L3USL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.25

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.47

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.60

+0.19

Drawdowns

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum 3USL.L drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRA.L and 3USL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGRA.L3USL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-76.72%

+45.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-25.29%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-48.69%

+33.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-63.47%

+39.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-1.82%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-15.26%

+10.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

6.31%

-3.74%

Volatility

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) is 3.51%, while WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that GGRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGRA.L3USL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

9.42%

-5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

25.26%

-15.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

34.36%

-22.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

47.39%

-32.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

48.51%

-33.60%

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRA.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than 3USL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGRA.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GGRA.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GGRA.L and 3USL.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGRA.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGRA.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.

GGRA.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while 3USL.L is Leveraged Equities. GGRA.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRA.L and 0.75% for 3USL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGRA.L and 3USL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer