3USL.L vs. CL2.F
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F).
3USL.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. It was launched on Dec 13, 2012.
Performance
3USL.L vs. CL2.F - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
3USL.L vs. CL2.F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | -21.40% | 28.97% | 64.00% | 70.49% | -57.35% | 101.77% | 7.89% | 97.98% | -27.34% | 69.34% |
CL2.F CyberAgent, Inc. | -0.13% | 24.02% | 8.23% | -27.65% | -46.93% | -3.07% | 96.53% | -8.51% | -2.27% | 55.74% |
Different Trading Currencies
3USL.L is traded in USD, while CL2.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CL2.F values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3USL.L achieves a -21.40% return, which is significantly lower than CL2.F's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, 3USL.L has outperformed CL2.F with an annualized return of 23.48%, while CL2.F has yielded a comparatively lower 4.16% annualized return.
3USL.L
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -19.26%
- YTD
- -21.40%
- 6M
- -15.40%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 34.49%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 23.48%
CL2.F
- 1D
- 4.53%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- -28.92%
- 1Y
- 13.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.85%
- 5Y*
- -14.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3USL.L vs. CL2.F — Risk / Return Rank
3USL.L
CL2.F
3USL.L vs. CL2.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3USL.L | CL2.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.33 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 0.80 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 0.32 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 0.61 | +2.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3USL.L | CL2.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.33 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | -0.34 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.10 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.00 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between 3USL.L and CL2.F is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
3USL.L vs. CL2.F - Dividend Comparison
3USL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CL2.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CL2.F CyberAgent, Inc. | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
3USL.L vs. CL2.F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3USL.L drawdown since its inception was -76.72%, smaller than the maximum CL2.F drawdown of -99.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3USL.L and CL2.F.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3USL.L | CL2.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.72% | -99.87% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.44% | -36.79% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.47% | -73.62% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.72% | -73.62% | -3.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.84% | -99.41% | +75.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.41% | -81.22% | +65.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.12% | 19.51% | -11.39% |
Volatility
3USL.L vs. CL2.F - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) is 12.00%, while CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F) has a volatility of 13.80%. This indicates that 3USL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL2.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 3USL.L | CL2.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.00% | 13.80% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.67% | 27.27% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.24% | 40.35% | +5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.21% | 40.86% | +6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.33% | 41.11% | +7.22% |