EDV.L vs. KGC

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Endeavour Mining Corp (EDV.L) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).

Performance

EDV.L vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Endeavour Mining Corp (EDV.L) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EDV.L vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EDV.L Endeavour Mining Corp	20.60%	183.47%	-15.30%	4.01%	8.12%	-0.86%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation	14.16%	184.30%	58.35%	44.24%	-18.98%	-21.15%

Different Trading Currencies

EDV.L is traded in GBp, while KGC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KGC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap EDV.L : £11.09B KGC : $38.09B
EPS EDV.L : £2.78 KGC : $1.97
PE Ratio EDV.L : 16.57 KGC : 16.03
PEG Ratio EDV.L : 0.27 KGC : 0.21
PS Ratio EDV.L : 2.65 KGC : 5.44
PB Ratio EDV.L : 3.66 KGC : 4.45
Total Revenue (TTM) EDV.L : £4.25B KGC : $7.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) EDV.L : £2.09B KGC : $3.48B
EBITDA (TTM) EDV.L : £2.34B KGC : $4.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDV.L achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's 14.16% return.

EDV.L

• 1D: -2.42%
• 1M: -3.68%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 50.05%
• 1Y: 158.27%
• 3Y*: 36.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KGC

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 6M: 28.64%
• 1Y: 147.60%
• 3Y*: 86.48%
• 5Y*: 38.91%
• 10Y*: 27.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EDV.L vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDV.L

EDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
EDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

KGC

KGC Risk / Return Rank: 93
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 91
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDV.L vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Endeavour Mining Corp (EDV.L) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDV.L	KGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.46	2.97	+0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	3.00	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.43	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.75	5.20	+1.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.42	18.56	+3.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDV.L vs. KGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is comparable to the KGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDV.L and KGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDV.L	KGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.46	2.97	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.15	+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between EDV.L and KGC is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EDV.L vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

EDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than KGC's 0.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EDV.L Endeavour Mining Corp	2.39%	2.33%	4.36%	3.49%	2.94%	1.27%	0.00%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation	0.43%	0.44%	1.29%	1.98%	2.93%	2.69%	0.82%

Drawdowns

EDV.L vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDV.L drawdown since its inception was -40.81%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -93.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDV.L and KGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDV.L	KGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.81%	-96.00%	+55.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.46%	-30.20%	+6.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.44%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.73%	-17.13%	+5.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.07%	-57.84%	+43.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.06%	8.65%	-1.59%

Volatility

EDV.L vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison

Endeavour Mining Corp (EDV.L) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) have volatilities of 16.51% and 16.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDV.L	KGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.51%	16.08%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.63%	39.67%	-3.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.92%	48.30%	-2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.45%	40.95%	-3.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.45%	46.21%	-8.76%

Financials

EDV.L vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Endeavour Mining Corp and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EDV.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Endeavour Mining Corp reported a gross profit of 654.61M and revenue of 1.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.7%.

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

EDV.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Endeavour Mining Corp reported an operating income of 568.41M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.0%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 985.01M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

EDV.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Endeavour Mining Corp reported a net income of 68.86M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 920.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 44.8%.