GGOV vs. IWM
GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGOV is a Global Bonds fund managed by iShares, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GGOV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
GGOV vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGOV achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 20.47% return.
GGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 20.47%
- 6M
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
GGOV vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.75% | -2.80% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 20.47% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGOV and IWM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGOV vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
GGOV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWM
GGOV vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGOV | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGOV vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGOV drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGOV and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGOV | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -59.05% | +54.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.96% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -10.75% | +9.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
GGOV vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGOV | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.28% | 19.74% | -14.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 22.61% | -17.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 23.06% | -17.78% |
GGOV vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGOV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGOV vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGOV and IWM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
GGOV is categorized as Global Bonds, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GGOV and 0.19% for IWM.
Find the right allocation for GGOV and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer