GGME vs. SPHQ
GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGME is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GGME returned 10.01%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGME charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
GGME vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GGME has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 10.01%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.
GGME
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -1.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 14.67%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 14.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
GGME vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | -1.63% | 16.39% | 32.67% | 23.76% | -36.43% | 10.68% | 36.26% | 20.28% | 1.97% | 7.61% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.64% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGME and SPHQ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005 | 0.75 |
The correlation between GGME and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GGME vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GGME
SPHQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
GGME
SPHQ
Communication Services
GGME
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
GGME
SPHQ
Financial Services
GGME
SPHQ
Industrials
GGME
SPHQ
Basic Materials
GGME
-
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
GGME
-
SPHQ
Energy
GGME
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
GGME
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
GGME
-
SPHQ
-
Utilities
GGME
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGME vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
GGME
SPHQ
GGME vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGME | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.33 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.81 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 11.97 | -12.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGME vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGME | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.13% | -57.83% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -8.90% | -16.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -16.57% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -25.04% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.35% | -31.60% | -14.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.11% | -2.84% | -8.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -10.67% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.41% | 2.08% | +9.33% |
Volatility
GGME vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 5.80%. This indicates that GGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGME | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 5.80% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 11.30% | +4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.78% | 13.41% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.36% | 16.59% | +7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 17.91% | +5.31% |
GGME vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGME vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SPHQ's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 2.31% | 0.76% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.16% | 1.11% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGME and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGME has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to SPHQ (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.47% vs 10.01% for GGME. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GGME.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.02% for GGME.
GGME is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGME and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer