GGME vs. QQQ
GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGME is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GGME returned 10.01%/yr vs 22.01%/yr for QQQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGME charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
GGME vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, GGME has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.01%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.01% annualized return.
GGME
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -1.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 25.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.01%
GGME vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | -1.63% | 16.39% | 32.67% | 23.76% | -36.43% | 10.68% | 36.26% | 20.28% | 1.97% | 7.61% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 15.95% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGME and QQQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GGME and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
GGME vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GGME
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
GGME
QQQ
Communication Services
GGME
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
GGME
QQQ
Financial Services
GGME
QQQ
Industrials
GGME
QQQ
Basic Materials
GGME
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
GGME
-
QQQ
Energy
GGME
-
QQQ
Healthcare
GGME
-
QQQ
Real Estate
GGME
-
QQQ
Utilities
GGME
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGME vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
GGME
QQQ
GGME vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGME | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.71 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 10.01 | -10.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGME vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGME | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.13% | -82.97% | +13.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -11.96% | -13.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -22.77% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -35.12% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.35% | -35.12% | -11.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.11% | -4.66% | -6.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -32.72% | +18.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.41% | 3.23% | +8.18% |
Volatility
GGME vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is 8.23%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that GGME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGME | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 9.17% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 14.54% | +1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.78% | 17.95% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.36% | 22.69% | +1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 22.41% | +0.81% |
GGME vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGME vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 2.31% | 0.76% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.16% | 1.11% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGME and QQQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to GGME (8.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.01% vs 10.01% for GGME. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, GGME has been the lower-risk option at 8.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.01% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GGME.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.02% for GGME.
GGME is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGME and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer