GGM vs. GDT
GGM (GGM Macro Alignment ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGM charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
GGM vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GGM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGM vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GGM GGM Macro Alignment ETF | 8.78% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGM and GDT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGM vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank
GGM
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GGM vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GGM Macro Alignment ETF (GGM) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGM | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGM vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGM drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGM and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGM | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.68% | -24.66% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -22.24% | +22.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -11.99% | +6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | — | — |
Volatility
GGM vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGM | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 32.28% | -20.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 32.28% | -18.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 32.28% | -18.99% |
GGM vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGM has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGM vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
GGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than GDT's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGM GGM Macro Alignment ETF | 1.40% | 1.57% | 1.39% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGM and GDT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for GGM.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.40% for GGM.
They also come from different issuers: GGM Wealth Advisors and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for GGM and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for GGM and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer