GGIFX vs. XEMD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GGIFX (Victory INCORE Fund for Income) and XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) are both funds - GGIFX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Victory, while XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Over the past 3 years, GGIFX returned 3.79%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for XEMD. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGIFX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XEMD.

Performance

GGIFX vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory INCORE Fund for Income (GGIFX) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGIFX achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's 2.75% return.

GGIFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 3.29%
• 3Y*: 3.79%
• 5Y*: 1.08%
• 10Y*: 1.17%

XEMD

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 11.88%
• 3Y*: 11.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGIFX vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GGIFX Victory INCORE Fund for Income	0.45%	4.28%	4.04%	4.01%	-1.66%
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	2.75%	13.98%	8.77%	10.26%	1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GGIFX and XEMD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022	0.51

The correlation between GGIFX and XEMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GGIFX vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGIFX

GGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 58
GGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
GGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
GGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

XEMD

XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 79
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGIFX vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory INCORE Fund for Income (GGIFX) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGIFX	XEMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.57	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	3.88	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.51	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	3.39	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.20	15.27	-3.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGIFX vs. XEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the XEMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGIFX and XEMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGIFX	XEMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.57	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	1.39	-0.21

Drawdowns

GGIFX vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGIFX drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum XEMD drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGIFX and XEMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGIFX	XEMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-10.01%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.03%	-3.52%	+2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.03%	-4.31%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.37%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.17%	-1.26%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.27%	0.78%	-0.51%

Volatility

GGIFX vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory INCORE Fund for Income (GGIFX) is 0.57%, while BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that GGIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGIFX	XEMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.57%	1.43%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.25%	3.70%	-2.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73%	4.66%	-2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.54%	6.88%	-4.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.27%	6.88%	-4.61%

GGIFX vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGIFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGIFX vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison

GGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than XEMD's 5.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGIFX Victory INCORE Fund for Income	4.92%	4.21%	5.33%	5.39%	5.40%	4.99%	4.61%	5.13%	5.59%	5.21%	5.22%	5.07%
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	5.82%	6.15%	6.30%	6.19%	3.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGIFX and XEMD in my portfolio?

GGIFX and XEMD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGIFX or XEMD?

XEMD has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to GGIFX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGIFX dropped -9.08% vs XEMD's -10.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.