PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGIFX vs. FGMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGIFX vs. FGMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory INCORE Fund for Income (GGIFX) and Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGIFX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than FGMNX's 0.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GGIFX having a 1.16% annualized return and FGMNX not far ahead at 1.21%.


GGIFX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.59%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*
1.16%

FGMNX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.18%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
1.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGIFX vs. FGMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGIFX
Victory INCORE Fund for Income
0.31%4.28%4.04%4.01%-5.47%-1.74%2.78%3.85%0.96%0.40%
FGMNX
Fidelity GNMA Fund
0.89%7.89%0.43%5.46%-11.52%-1.03%3.74%5.72%0.62%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GGIFX and FGMNX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.69

The correlation between GGIFX and FGMNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (10 years) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGIFX vs. FGMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGIFX
GGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FGMNX
FGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGIFX vs. FGMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory INCORE Fund for Income (GGIFX) and Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGIFXFGMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.56

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

8.21

+3.35

GGIFX vs. FGMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FGMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGIFX and FGMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGIFXFGMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.71

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.04

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.26

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

1.04

+0.15

Drawdowns

GGIFX vs. FGMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGIFX drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum FGMNX drawdown of -16.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGIFX and FGMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGIFXFGMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

-16.84%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.03%

-2.54%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

-7.23%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.39%

-16.54%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.08%

-16.84%

+7.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-1.28%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-1.91%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

0.79%

-0.52%

Volatility

GGIFX vs. FGMNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory INCORE Fund for Income (GGIFX) is 0.59%, while Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that GGIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGIFXFGMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

1.31%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.26%

2.66%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74%

3.81%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.54%

6.25%

-3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.27%

4.67%

-2.40%

GGIFX vs. FGMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGIFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FGMNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGIFX vs. FGMNX - Dividend Comparison

GGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than FGMNX's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGMNX
Fidelity GNMA Fund
3.62%3.61%3.23%3.45%1.68%0.76%1.61%2.46%2.19%2.17%2.61%2.25%
GGIFX
Victory INCORE Fund for Income
4.93%4.21%5.33%5.39%5.40%4.99%4.61%5.13%5.59%5.21%5.22%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGIFX and FGMNX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGMNX has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to GGIFX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGIFX dropped -9.08% vs FGMNX's -16.84%.

GGIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGIFX and FGMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer